COST vs WMT

Drawdown risk comparison: who drops more, who recovers faster

Current Comparison

WMT is currently more oversold with a severity score of 1.2 (Slightly Elevated) compared to COST at 1.0 (Slightly Elevated).

Head-to-Head Metrics

MetricCOSTWMT
Price$1018.55$126.79
All-Time High$1072.45$133.89
Current Drawdown-5.0%-5.3%
Severity Score1.01.2
Days in Drawdown36934
Avg Max Drawdown-4.6%-4.1%
Total Drawdown Events5050
Avg Recovery (10%+ drops)253 days238 days

Worst Drawdowns

COST

2022-04-31.4%607d
2021-12-15.9%89d
2024-03-10.3%63d
2024-07-9.5%48d
2024-12-8.5%54d

WMT

2022-04-25.7%419d
2025-02-21.9%215d
2023-11-10.8%79d
2024-07-5.8%29d
2024-12-5.7%50d

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has a higher drawdown severity, COST or WMT?

WMT has a higher severity score of 1.2 (Slightly Elevated) compared to COST at 1.0 (Slightly Elevated).

Which stock recovers faster from drawdowns, COST or WMT?

When dropping 10% or more, COST has historically recovered in an average of 253 days (based on 3 events) while WMT averages 238 days (based on 3 events).

What is the biggest drop for COST vs WMT?

COST's worst recorded drawdown was -31.4% while WMT's worst was -25.7%.

Track Both Stocks

Monitor COST and WMT severity scores and get alerted when either crosses into a new zone.

Get Started Free

Disclaimer: DrawdownAlerts provides historical data analysis, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.