Exelon Is Down 8%. What History Says About the EXC Pullback
Exelon's 8% Pullback Recovers to Green Zone: What History Shows
As of June 12, 2026, Exelon Corporation (EXC) has transitioned from the yellow zone of elevated risk back into the green zone, with its drawdown moderating to -8.1% at a closing price of $46.21. While this price stabilization represents a verified improvement, where do the company's valuation multiples now sit within its own historical record? Our data shows that despite the price recovering from its recent lows, the stock's valuation multiples remain remarkably high relative to its historical distribution. Specifically, we must examine whether the price recovery has pulled the multiples back toward their long-term medians, or if they remain elevated compared to the stock's past performance.
Drawdown Severity Score™
Down 8% over 62 days. This is within the normal range for this asset.
Article data as of June 12, 2026
1.80
Price
$46.21
All-Time High
$50.29
Drawdown
-8.1%
Duration
62 days
Analyzing Exelon's Current Drawdown Severity
As of June 12, 2026, the Drawdown Severity Score™ for EXC stands at 1.8, which corresponds to a "Slightly Elevated" risk level within the green zone. This score marks a clear improvement from the yellow zone, indicating that the immediate selling pressure has subsided into a more typical historical range. The stock's current drawdown has lasted 62 days, measured from its all-time high of $50.29 down to its current price of $46.21.
To put this 62-day period into context, we analyze the stock's extensive trading history. Across 224 total historical drawdown events recorded in our database, the average maximum drawdown is -4.0%, and the average drawdown duration is 63 days. The current duration of 62 days is nearly identical to this historical average, suggesting that the timeline of this correction is mature compared to routine historical pullbacks. However, the depth of the current drawdown (-8.1%) remains more than double the historical average depth of -4.0%, indicating that this correction has been deeper than a standard fluctuation.
Understanding these transitions between risk zones is essential for evaluating utility equities. The green zone signals that the asset's drawdown is within a more typical, less severe range, whereas the yellow zone indicates elevated drawdown risk. For EXC, crossing back into the green zone suggest that the worst of the immediate downward momentum has paused, though the total drawdown depth remains technically unresolved.
EXC Drawdown History
Percentage below all-time high over time
Article data
-8.1%
June 12, 2026
Valuation Versus Its Own Record
To evaluate this recovery fully, we examine how the current valuation multiples compare to the stock's historical benchmarks. As of the valuation snapshot date of 2026-06-12, the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for EXC stands at 1.9. This ratio sits in the 84th percentile of its own daily P/S record since 2006-06-12, meaning that the stock has traded at a lower P/S ratio during 84% of the daily trading sessions over the past two decades. For historical context, the median P/S ratio for EXC over this timeframe is 1.1.
The Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio shows an even greater divergence from historical norms. As of 2026-06-12, the EV/EBITDA ratio for EXC is 10.8, placing it in the 93rd percentile of its own daily EV/EBITDA record since 2006-06-12. The historical median EV/EBITDA ratio for the stock is 6.3.
These percentiles indicate that despite the -8.1% price drawdown from its all-time high, the stock's multiples remain historically high relative to its own past record. A high percentile ranking means the multiple is elevated compared to the asset's own history, while a low percentile would indicate a lower-than-normal valuation multiple. This historical context is presented purely as data-driven analysis and does not constitute a financial recommendation of any kind.
How Prior Comparable Drawdowns Evolved
To understand how the current recovery might unfold, we look at how EXC has behaved during similar market events. Out of 224 total historical drawdown events, the stock has experienced a drop of 5% or more exactly 43 times.
The average duration of these comparable 5%+ drops is 289 days. This is significantly longer than the current drawdown duration of 62 days, highlighting that deeper corrections for this utility stock often require extended periods to fully resolve.
The table below contrasts the current active drawdown with the historical averages for all events and comparable 5%+ events.
| Metric | Current Drawdown (As of June 12, 2026) | All Historical Drawdowns (Average) | Comparable 5%+ Drawdowns (Average) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drawdown Depth | -8.1% | -4.0% | -5.0% or greater |
| Duration in Days | 62 days | 63 days | 289 days |
| Total Occurrences | 1 (Active) | 224 events | 43 events |
This comparison shows that while the severity score has returned to the green zone, the duration of the current drawdown is still in its early stages relative to the 289-day average for historical 5%+ pullbacks. Historically, utility stocks can experience prolonged recovery periods due to their steady, regulated business models, which do not typically produce the rapid earnings spikes seen in high-growth sectors. Consequently, past recoveries of this magnitude have often required patient, multi-month consolidations before the stock fully reclaimed its prior peaks.
What History Says
Article data as of June 12, 2026
EXC has dropped 5%+ from its high 43 times in its tracked history.
Occurrences
43
Avg Duration
289
days
Showing 27 of 43 comparable events from available data. View all
| Period | Max Drop | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2008 to Nov 2021 | -62.3% | 4862 days |
| Dec 2000 to Oct 2003 | -40.7% | 1007 days |
| May 1999 to Aug 2000 | -35.9% | 449 days |
| Feb 1996 to May 1998 | -35.3% | 825 days |
| Dec 1989 to Aug 1991 | -34.8% | 611 days |
| Apr 2022 to Mar 2025 | -29.1% | 1076 days |
| Feb 1987 to Feb 1989 | -26.1% | 730 days |
| Sep 1993 to Oct 1995 | -24.7% | 758 days |
Market Factors and Recent News Context
To understand the fundamental drivers behind these numbers, we examine recent news and market developments. According to a report by TIKR.com, EXC has recently traded close to its 52-week low, but growing interest in data center infrastructure could shift the long-term demand story. Tech companies require vast amounts of reliable power to fuel artificial intelligence data centers, positioning major utility providers like Exelon as critical infrastructure partners.
This long-term growth narrative may explain why the stock's valuation multiples remain in the 84th and 93rd percentiles despite the recent price pullback. Additionally, a report by Yahoo Finance highlights that institutional investors dominate the stock's ownership structure, holding 88% of the total outstanding shares. This heavy institutional concentration typically provides a stable base of long-term holders, though it can also lead to concentrated selling pressure if large institutions shift their defensive sector allocations.
Furthermore, capital allocation decisions continue to influence investor sentiment. According to Stock Titan, Exelon shareholders of record by June 4, 2026, receive a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. This reliable income stream remains a primary draw for institutional capital, even as the stock underperforms broader market indices like the Dow, as noted in a recent market review by Barchart.com.
Monitoring Key Severity Thresholds
As EXC attempts to stabilize in the green zone, market participants should watch several key metrics to gauge the health of the recovery.
First, monitor the Drawdown Severity Score™ to see if it remains stable below the 2.0 threshold. If the score rises and crosses back into the yellow zone, it would suggest that the current recovery has stalled and that the drawdown is expanding toward deeper historical levels.
Second, track whether the valuation percentiles begin to moderate toward their historical medians. With the P/S ratio at 1.9 (84th percentile) and the EV/EBITDA ratio at 10.8 (93rd percentile) as of June 12, 2026, any further price increases without equivalent revenue or EBITDA growth will push these multiples into even more extreme historical territory. Conversely, if the stock price remains flat while underlying fundamentals improve, these percentiles may slowly decline toward their long-term medians of 1.1 and 6.3, respectively.
Finally, pay close attention to the duration of the drawdown. Since comparable 5%+ historical drawdowns have averaged 289 days to resolve, the current 62-day duration suggests that the stock may spend more time consolidating before a full recovery is established.
Track EXC's Drawdown Severity Score™
Set a custom alert and get notified when EXC crosses into a new severity zone.
Get Started FreeGet the weekly drawdown digest
A weekly summary of fresh drawdown analysis, market severity changes, and watchlist setup ideas. No per-article blasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
How far has EXC fallen from its all-time high?
As of June 12, 2026, Exelon Corporation has fallen 8.1% from its all-time high of $50.29, closing at a price of $46.21. This pullback has lasted for 62 days since the peak. While the stock has stabilized recently, this decline is still more than double its historical average drawdown depth of 4.0%.
What is EXC's drawdown?
As of June 12, 2026, Exelon Corporation has a Drawdown Severity Score of 1.8, which places the stock in the green zone of slightly elevated risk. This score indicates that immediate selling pressure has subsided and the stock is returning to a more typical historical range. It represents a verified improvement from the higher-risk yellow zone.
How long has EXC been in a drawdown?
As of June 12, 2026, Exelon Corporation has been in a drawdown for 62 days. This duration is nearly identical to the company's historical average drawdown duration of 63 days, which is based on 224 historical events. This suggests the timeline of the current correction is mature compared to routine historical pullbacks.
Disclaimer: DrawdownAlerts provides historical data analysis, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Severity scores are analytical tools, not buy/sell signals. Always do your own research before making investment decisions.